Firewall
November 30, 2009
|
IMDB rating: 5.80 Plot: With his family held for ransom, the head security executive for a global bank is commanded to loot his own business for millions in order to ensure his wife and children’s safety. He then faces the demanding task of thwarting the kidnapper’s grand scheme, which makes him look guilty of embezzlement. |
Actors: Ford Harrison,Bettany Paul,Patrick Robert,Thriller,Drama,CrimeAction,
are these good HARDWARE FIREWALLS?
i have been looking for a good hardware firewall without breaking the bank, are any of the ones here good, especially in the $200 dollar range which is really where i would like to go??
http://www.newegg.com/store/SubCategory. aspx?SubCategory=529&name=Network-Fi rewalls&nm_mc=KNC-GoogleAdwords& cm_mmc=KNC-GoogleAdwords-_-NA-_-NA-_-NA
All are going to be decent. Todays "Home" firewalls are certainly all good. While I wouldn’t run a business with them — well a midrange/larger business with them — they are ALL going to provide great firewalling capabilities. I’m a Cisco engineer so of course I’d lean that way. I personally use a 5505 @ home, but even though it has a decent GUI, it’s really for those of us who are command line driven. On the other hand, though I will never recommend Sonicwall to business customers, their firewalls are pretty decent and are all web driven in as far as configurations, etc.
I think that may be your best bet, unless you’ve had Cisco CLI experience before. Just my 2 cents worth.
Billy B | Nov 22, 2009
Bourne Ultimatum, The
November 30, 2009
|
IMDB rating: 8.20 Plot: Bourne is once again brought out of hiding, this time inadvertently by London-based reporter Simon Ross who is trying to unveil Operation BlackBriar—an upgrade to Project Treadstone—in a series of newspaper columns. Bourne (Damon) sets up a meeting with Ross (Considine) and realizes instantly they’re being scanned. Information from the reporter stirs a new set of memories, and Bourne must finally, ultimately, uncover his dark past whilst dodging The Company’s best efforts in trying to eradicate him. |
Actors: Damon Matt,Considine Paddy,Ramirez Edgar,Adkins Scott,Ansah Joey,Daniel Bruhl,Cooper Chris,Cox Brian,Fredenburgh Dan,Gallop Tom,Johnson Corey,St. John Trevor,Strathairn David,Action,Adventure,Drama,Mystery,Thriller,
what are the motorola phones that are featured in the film Bourne Ultimatum?
not the sliding ones or flip up.
If its not sliding or flip then i think it might be the SLVR
http://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sQu ickSearch=yes&sName=slvr
Follow this link and see if its one of these.
Sorry i haven’t seen the film yet just going on your description.
Playmate25 | Aug 21, 2007
Is that film good? Really want to go and see it!!
013megustastu013 | Aug 20, 2007
The motorola phones were the Moto Rokr Z6.
Nokia phones (Nokia N93) were also used in the movie by the CIA agents when they transmitted live footage to their headquarters.
DV | Aug 21, 2007
Cinderella
November 30, 2009
|
IMDB rating: 7.30 Plot: In a far away, long ago kingdom, Cinderella is living happily with her mother and father until her mother dies. Cinderella’s father remarries a cold, cruel woman who has two daughters, Drizella and Anastasia. When the father dies, Cinderella’s wicked stepmother turns her into a virtual servant in her own house. Meanwhile, across town in the castle, the King determines that his son the Prince should find a suitable bride and provide him with a required number of grandchildren. So the King invites every eligible maiden in the kingdom to a fancy dress ball, where his son will be able to choose his bride. Cinderella has no suitable party dress for a ball, but her friends the mice, lead by Jaques and Gus, and the birds lend a hand in making her one, a dress the evil stepsisters immediately tear apart on the evening of the ball. At this point, enter the Fairy Godmother, the pumpkin carriage, the royal ball, the stroke of midnight, the glass slipper, and the rest, as they say, is fairy tale history. |
Actors: MacDonald James,Van Rooten Luis,Barclay Don,Douglas Mike,Fontaine John,Keen Earl,McCauley Clint,Phipps William,Woodbury John,Animation,Family,Fantasy,Musical,Romance,
How do you think Cinderella changed America?
How do you think Disney’s ‘Cinderella’ changed America? What kind of evidence do you have to support this?
yeah, and this isn’t homework. cause i’m actually capable of doing that myself.
just because i can word a question intelligently doesn’t mean i copied it from a worksheet.
Cinderella is annoyingly passive. She never once stands up for herself or does anything to change her own future. Everybody does things for her: her critter friends, her fairy godmother. Everything HAPPENS to her, but she doesn’t do anything to deserve it, as far as I’m concerned. And it really bothers me that she falls in "love" with the prince without saying one freakin’ word to him. Yeah, little girls watch it and want to be just like her. Maybe this was a very early forerunner of Twilight. Hmmm.
*goes off to write paper comparing Cinderella to Twilight*
Charlotte | Nov 23, 2009
People now like pumpkins more.
Destroyer of Dumbasses | Nov 23, 2009
Now people feel good about themselves! YAY!!!!!!!! everyone is a PRINCESS!!!!!!
Me Has A Yahoo Answers Account!! | Nov 23, 2009
how about you do your own homework
thomas | Nov 23, 2009
cuz dreams do come true!
residentevil808 | Nov 23, 2009
Is the Tea Party against "The Princess and the Frog"?
November 28, 2009
I am a member of the Tea Party and I don’t like this new film. I can’t really point out why but I don’t like the princess. There is just something very wrong with her. I like the other classic films except Aladdin and this film just doesn’t seem right. This Princess is just wrong. Who agrees with me.
Join those of us that are in reality and not Hollywood Fantasyland!
Freedom Wins | Nov 27, 2009
who the f cares about a cartoon movie, politically?
Peace and Love | Nov 27, 2009
Not only that, but it’s a movie about bestiality! A young woman has full lip-to-lip contact with an amphibian! Is this a value we want to teach our children? Our little girls?
And there are depictions of witchcraft. Creatures that talk and humans being transformed by supernatural magic.
Come join the Right in burning copies of the DVD today, won’t you?
Quirk | Nov 27, 2009
Haven’t seen it, probably won’t. All Disney cartoons, at least since the 80’s, have a political skew to them.
Volunteers of America | Nov 27, 2009
You’re a Troll, c’mon, it wasn’t hard to figure out, why the hell would political activists be talking about a f*cking cartoon.
Luke808666 | Nov 27, 2009
sadly, you’ve been programed by the socialist. you can’t tell the difference between tea and the kool aid your so fond of!
afratta437 | Nov 27, 2009
Well, the Liberals hate the movie too, since the title reminds them of the differences between Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton.
TERRY BRO | Nov 27, 2009
Their answer depends on whether Obama is for it.
Steve | Nov 27, 2009
Get over yourself.
And your not even a Tea Party member. You are a liberal insulting others.
Giachetta *Italian Chick* | Nov 27, 2009
Ghost Town
November 28, 2009
|
IMDB rating: 7.80 Plot: Bertram Pincus is a man whose people skills leave much to be desired. When Pincus dies unexpectedly, but is miraculously revived after seven minutes, he wakes up to discover that he now has the annoying ability to see ghosts. Even worse, they all want something from him, particularly Frank Herlihy who pesters him into breaking up the impending marriage of his widow Gwen. That puts Pincus squarely in the middle of a triangle with spirited result. |
Available versions:
DivX Version (Normal Quality), iPod/iPhone Version, HD Ready:720p (Super Quality)
Actors: Kinnear Greg,Carlos Jordan,Badalucco Jr. Joseph,Hutchison Brian,Simpson Tyree Michael,Gervais Ricky,Mandvi Aasif,Lee Raymond J.,Mazzarino Joey,Oscar Brad,Comedy,Fantasy,Romance,
What is the most photogenic Ghost Town in the Southwest?
I like Oatman and Bisbee. Not true ghost towns though.
Any I have missed?
As you note, Oatman and Bisbee (and most of the other ones mentioned above) have permanent populations and businesses and are not true ghost towns (really more historic communities).
For true ghost towns in the southwest (ie: mostly or entirely abandoned), I would rate the following as being the most photogenic:
Rhyolite, NV – There is the famous 3-story building where only the front is standing and so you see sky through the windows.
Animas Forks, CO – There is an old mansion with bay windows against a impressive Rocky Mountain background.
Cabezon, NM – Many old buildings, some quite interesting with the distinctive Cabezon Peak in the background (not open to the public).
Vulture Mine, AZ – Several interesting buildings, stark desert scenery.
Swansea, AZ – Many buildings, include old cabins in a row. Also nice desert scenery.
Sasco, AZ – Ok… maybe not the most photogenic, but a neat place with several buildings (and the source of my screen name).
Of old communities with nicely preserved historic districts, in addition to Bisbee, Jerome, Oatman and Silverton mentioned above, I would add the following:
Saint Elmo, CO – Several great buildings along a well preserved main street.
Mogollon, NM – Many great buildings located in a scenic steep-walled canyon (once used as a movie set).
Tombstone, AZ – Getting kinda touristy now, but many great and photogenic historic buildings if you look past the hype.
Chase Street – Clifton, AZ – One of the most amazing and largely abandoned main streets located against towering desert cliffs. Picture one of the main streets from Bisbee or Jerome, but with 90% of the buildings empty.
sascoaz | Jan 01, 2008
I’ve been to Bellmont and Weeks in Nevada….Copper Creek and Jerome in Arizona….Silverton in Colorado and Grafton in Utah. they are all rather photogenic…depending on what it is exactly that you want to snap a shot of. Of them all, Silverton was the best kept…but its sort of campy and very touristy.
aidan402 | Dec 30, 2007
I like Vulture Mine West of Wickenberg.
Yes, Silvertown, CO is intersting and the train ride from Durango is nice too.
fhotoace | Dec 30, 2007
Flesh and Blood Show, The
November 28, 2009
|
IMDB rating: 5.20 Plot: Actors rehearsing a show at a mysterious seaside theater are being killed off by an unknown maniac. |
buy Flesh and Blood Show, The and instant download
Available versions:
DivX Version (Normal Quality), iPod/iPhone Version
Actors: Brooks Ray,Askwith Robin,Rogers Tristan,Howey David,Barr Patrick,Young Raymond,Tuley Brian,Diak Rodney,Horror,Thriller,
Question to Atheists: How do you account for morality?
As a worldview, atheism is intellectually bankrupt and is wrought with philosophical problems. The inability for the atheistic worldview to offer objective morality is one of the biggest reason that it is important to teach our children about God no matter what.
First I need to clarify that SOME atheists can be morally good. But having good morals (based on the Bible) doesn
1 soldier to war for 1 year:$500k 1 student to University 1 year:$50k Q: Send 1 to war or 10 to college?
November 27, 2009
Article Text:
Reporting from Washington – As President Obama measures the potential burden of a new war strategy in Afghanistan, his administration is struggling to come up with even the most dispassionate of predictions: the actual price tag for the anticipated buildup of troops.
The calculations so far have produced a sweeping range. The Pentagon publicly estimates it will cost $500,000 a year for every additional service member sent to the war zone. Obama’s budget experts size it up at twice that much.
In coming up with such numbers, the White House and the military have different priorities as well as different methods.
The president’s advisors don’t want to underestimate the cost and then lose the public’s faith. The Pentagon worries about sticker shock as commanders push for an increase of as many as 40,000 troops.
Both sides emphasize that their figures are estimates and could change — in fact, a Pentagon comptroller assessment this month put the number closer to that of Obama’s Office of Management and Budget.
Still, budgeting and politics are entwined, and numbers can always support more than one point of view.
The Bush White House minimized costs as it moved toward war. Obama is weighing skeptically an escalation of a war he didn’t launch. In his campaign, Obama promised not to tuck war costs away, off federal budget books.
"Our resources in manpower, our resources in human lives and our resources in money are not infinite," White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said in an interview. "The notion that we wouldn’t take each of those things into account does not make a lot of sense to this commander in chief."
All of those elements are under consideration as Obama wraps up a review of war strategy. He is expected any week now to respond to requests from his commander in the region for a strategy change and for additional forces. The White House could announce an increase of 20,000 to 40,000 troops shortly after Thanksgiving.
During a recent session of his war council — where one contingent has questioned the wisdom of sending more troops — Obama asked how much it would cost to pay for the troops Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal has requested. The president sought an exact accounting, a request that turned out to be more complicated than anticipated.
The Office of Management and Budget says adding 40,000 troops would cost about $40 billion a year, or $1 million each. White House officials included in their estimate everything they consider necessary to wage war, including troop housing and equipment.
Inside and outside the Pentagon, some suspect an effort to undermine support for a troop increase. "The large-scale message has been, ‘This is going to be hard and expensive,’ " said Thomas Donnelly, an American Enterprise Institute fellow and defense expert.
The Pentagon arrived at its much lower estimate by dividing its war funding request by the number of troops throughout the region: 68,000 in Afghanistan and up to 95,000 in supporting roles elsewhere, such as on nearby ships or in surrounding countries.
The Pentagon cost includes higher combat wages, extra aircraft hours and other operations and maintenance costs, but omits such items as new weapons purchases — one-time costs that vary by year — and support equipment like spy satellites and anti-roadside-bomb technology.
The Pentagon also does not try to estimate costs of new bases for additional soldiers.
But in a memo early this month, obtained by The Times’ Washington bureau, the Pentagon’s own comptroller produced an estimate that broke with the customary Defense formula and did include construction and equipment.
That memo said the yearly cost of a 40,000-troop increase would be $30 billion to $35 billion — at least $750,000 a person. An increase of 20,000 would cost $20 billion to $25 billion annually, it said — a per-soldier cost equal to or greater than the White House estimate.
Even determining past spending is a fuzzy endeavor: Big chunks are paid through emergency measures and are not calculated into the total.
Under questioning by the House Armed Services Committee this month, a Congressional Budget Office expert couldn’t say how much it costs to run the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"I find it astonishing that, eight years into this, we haven’t nailed it down with precision," another witness at the table, David Berteau, director of the Defense Industrial Initiatives Group of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said later.
And yet the effort is necessary, said Stephen Daggett of the Congressional Research Service: "If the budget is going to be constrained, one of the questions we have to ask is whether we can sustain the increases in forces."
Partisans of all stripes are likely to think first about intangibles, including American tolerance for troop casualties and support for sending new troops to Afghanistan.
Democratic leaders say money won’t determ
Holy #### – A Liberal is using Logic! What’s the world coming to?
8***L | Nov 23, 2009
You are missing the more important figure, which is how much money can be made by defense contractors and oil and gas companies.
Eudes | Nov 23, 2009
MORE WAR!!!!!!!!!!!
Doodu Brown | Nov 23, 2009
Hmmm….1 person to go and kill people, or ten to go and learn for the same price? yeah that’s tough.
Machinehead 625 NYY WORLD CHAMPS | Nov 23, 2009
When making the decison to defend our nation or retaliate against attacks, I don’t believe we should consider "what else can we do with this money?" to be a very important question. I’m sure you would counter this point by saying the war is frivolous and not important to our national interests, but you have to establish that first before you can move onto this type of arguement. And if the war is in fact frivolous and not important to national interests, again, should we really have to resort to this argument? The decison to fight or not to fight should not be based on the cost.
EDIT: I’m amazed at people who give me thumbs down for this. You really believe the cost of war should be a serious consideration when deciding whether or not to defend american interests!? What a bunch of cowards you all are! Where is your backbone!? I’m ashamed to have you as countrymen, and I hope to God that I’ll never have to rely upon any of you to protect our nation.
GrizzlyMint | Nov 23, 2009
wow quite a manifesto. when did the president start worrying about spending money.
short answer I don’t like our troops being there, but the moral obligation is if we broke it we have to fix it
Dusty the electrician | Nov 23, 2009
Send more kids to college so we would’nt have to go to war.
Stickboy | Nov 23, 2009
I think you’re misunderstanding the point here.
Making war and pissing of the world is manly.
Getting educated and protecting the economy for years to come is something wimps do!
Plus more educated people would allow us to understand our enemy and how to fight them better. Then we would end wars too quickly and there wouldn’t be enough American manliness.
And with more educated liberals sitting around coffee shops and fewer people pissed at me, there would be just as many people as we hate but fewer I can legally shoot.
Jesse | Nov 23, 2009
What are you having for turkey day dinner?
November 27, 2009
I am having: A big turkey, stuffing, poppovers, mashed potatos with special gravy, green bean/bacon dish thing, a peacan pie and two pumpkin!
turkery dressing peas
awommack | Nov 26, 2009
ham
mashed potatos
green beans
rice
mrs_pipesmoker | Nov 26, 2009
Roast turkey breast, mashed potatoes & gravy, sage dressing, cornbread dressing, green beans, relish tray and Nutty Buddy Pie.
http://allrecipes.com/Recipe/Nutty-Buddy -Pies/Detail.aspx
Merry Cranberry, everyone!
Major Eyeswater | Nov 26, 2009
A lot of stuff.
But especially ham & pineapple, my favorite!
-?
Contender, The – DivX Version (Normal Quality), iPod/iPhone Version
November 26, 2009
|
IMDB rating: 6.80 Plot: After his Vice-president suddenly dies, the President (Jeff Bridges) who is near the end of his final term, decides to leave a legacy by selecting a woman to fill the position. Enter a Senator (Joan Allen), who has shifted from the Republican Party to the Democratic. Initially appearing to be the perfect candidate, an allegation suddenly appears that she had been involved in a sexual orgy as a 19 year old in college. The confirmation committee chairman (Gary Oldman), a Republican, leaks the information to the press, while using the press discussion as a forum to bring it into the hearings. The chairman desires to get a Governor (William Petersen) into the office. The Governor had become a national hero when he attempted to rescue a young woman from a car that crashed from a bridge into deep water near where the Governor had been fishing. |
Available versions:
DivX Version (Normal Quality), iPod/iPhone Version
Actors: Oldman Gary,Bridges Jeff,Slater Christian,Elliott Sam,Petersen William,Rubinek Saul,Hall Philip Baker,Binder Mike,Thomas Robin,Urbanski Douglas,Fryrear Noah,Taylor Joe,Geer Kevin,Roberts Doug,Appleton Bev,Drama,Thriller,
do you like the cena vs sheamus for TLC PPV?
i am so glad that cena is facing a young, non-main event wrestler at this next ppv. maybe wwe is finally finding out that they need to produce young stars for raw. at least on smackdown the wwe did a good job this year with putting the world belts on other guys like cm punk and jeff hardy.
i think its very refreshing for sheamus to at least feud with cena for one month. i looked back on the wwe title picture this past year and the majority of the wwe champions and challengers only consisted of hhh, orton, cena, edge. they need new contenders.
do you like this match: cena vs sheamus?
yes now Cena can show sheamus what ever he has done to the superstars
Moaz | Nov 24, 2009
Personally I Dont Like It. Rather Have Like Mvp Or Ted Dibiase Jr.
Anthony B | Nov 24, 2009
It should be a knoickdown drag down fight. It will be a very physical match and maybe this feud can carry into the Royal Rumble and beyond.
Julius C | Nov 24, 2009
Sheamus? What? Who? What has the Celtic Clown done to deserve being in a pay per view main event? Nothing.
Steve | Nov 24, 2009
I like the new blood in the title hunt, but so many of the other 14 non-champions in the qualifiers should have had a shot over Sheamus
MVP: former US champ,
Kofi: former IC champ,
Truth: former TNA champ
not only do thses thre have a title history and get huge pops, but they’ve also bee in WWE far longer than Sheamus,
so yes new blood is great, but not so new that the guy isn’t ready for it, either as a performer or as a person.
TJanssen411 | Nov 24, 2009
No I hate the concept of this match. Cena vs Sheamus? That is not a money maker (Vince loves money makers) and Sheamus has done nothing to deserve a title shot. He has been with the company for 2 or 3 months and he already gets a title shot for beating up jobbers?
I think I know of someone who REALLY deserves a title shot. He is an African American, has braids, former 2 time U.S. Champ and the longest reining in WWE history at that, can cut a hell of a promo, and former WWE Tag Champion. He goes by the name of MVP who, unlike Sheamus, has made a name for himself. Now if MVP were to got a title shot, that would have been………… BALLIN!!!!
Straight Edge Enigma~ Ballin!!!! | Nov 24, 2009
NO!
Emme. Esse. | Nov 24, 2009
Hopefully with this move Sheamus can kick the title off of Superman’s waist
Eric | Nov 24, 2009
yes but they are gona due 1 of 2 pushes
there is the Vladimir Koslov push.
Which resulted in a? horreeeeeeendous Survivor Series 08 match that sent him to ECW.
or there is the Brock Lesnar push.
u no new guy trashes every 1 who gets in his way wins the belt early holds it 4 a while loses it a a guy who was in a bad way 2 turn in to main event type of deal
Jack | Nov 24, 2009
No, I wanted truth, MVP, Mark henry or a person from legacy to win but I am happy that fag randy didn’t win it if it was a randy and sheamus for a #1 contender match and sheamus I would be happy.
answersking | Nov 24, 2009
Does anyone have a link to Laura Wasser Picture?
November 26, 2009
Laura Wasser- famous CA divorce lawyer
Look here you have to scroll fown but her photo is there.
http://www.tmz.com/2006/11/07/britney-sp ears-files-for-divorce/
jsauls3271 | Nov 09, 2006